Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03301
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jerel Lamar Davis, James Paul Carozza, Joseph C Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00783
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Jerel Lamar Davis, James Paul Carozza, Joseph C Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Daigle v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02299
Plaintiff:
Steve Paul Daigle, Jr.
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Westlake Management Services, Inc. v. Daigle
as 2:2018cv00364
Plaintiff:
Westlake Management Services Inc
Defendant:
James Paul Daigle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
AAL Group Ltd v. Black Hall Aerospace Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
AAL Group Ltd
Defendant:
Black Hall Aerospace Inc, Paul Daigle and Keith Woolford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AAL USA Inc v. Black Hall Aerospace Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02090
Plaintiff:
AAL USA Inc
Defendant:
Black Hall LLC , Corvis Arrow LLC , Cold Harbor Certifications Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daigle v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2016cv01445
Defendant:
U S Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Louis Paul Daigle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Roland Daigle, et al v. James Kennedy
as 08-56377
Debtor:
In the Matter of: ROLAND PAUL DAIGLE
Appellant:
ROLAND PAUL DAIGLE
Appellee:
JAMES KENNEDY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00256
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BAP)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
