Brown v. Samaniego et al
| William Otis James Brown |
| John Samaniego, Jay Fondran, Hood, Black, Goode, Woods and Gentry |
| 2:2017cv00965 |
| June 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 1/4/2019. (PSM)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is AC CEPTED. The court ORDERS that all claims against all defendants in this action -- except (1) the Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claims against defendants Goode, Gentry, Woods, Hood, and Samaniego regarding the plaintiff's October 20 16, disciplinary action, and (2) the Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process claims against Sgt. John Doe and Samaniego regarding the plaintiff's December 2016, disciplinary action -- are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The court further ORDERS that the remaining claims are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 3/21/2018. (PSM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
