Cases 1 - 10 of 2,480
Isom v. LaGrand et al
as 3:2025cv00068
Plaintiff:
Aaron Isom
Defendant:
Kara LaGrand, Starlin Gentry, Paul Malay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Majestic Christian Center et al v. Key Star Capital Fund III LLP et al
as 4:2025cv00459
Plaintiff:
Majestic Christian Center and Harold Gentry
Defendant:
Key Star Capital Fund III LLP, Key Star, Key Star Capital Fund II NC Ventures Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gentry v. American Trust Company
as 2:2025cv02094
Plaintiff:
Lily Gentry
Defendant:
American Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gentry et al v. Prell et al
as 5:2025cv00050
Plaintiff:
Kim Gentry and Kim Gentry Dressage LLC
Defendant:
DVM Melissa Prell, DVM William B Russell and Peterson & Smith Equine Hospital, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Minnick v. Colvin
as 0:2024cv04550
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Gentry Minnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McBee v. Gentry
as 1:2024cv07311
Defendant:
Ms. Gentry
Plaintiff:
Joshua Alan McBee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.