Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. 0.16 Acre, more or less, in Pocahontas County, West Virginia, located on parcel identification No. 03-32-0034-0000-0000, and being more particularly described as Lot 18 in Parcel 2 in a deed in book 2 et al
as 2:2018cv00093
Defendant:
Lindsay Jaman South, Lindsay McVay Roberson, Erin Nichole Hankins Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv03656
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211
Gentry v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv03629
Plaintiff:
Tina Gentry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv11203
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Gentry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv11156
Plaintiff:
Jane Gentry
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald et al v. Justice et al
as 5:2016cv09952
Plaintiff:
Howard McDonald, Nicholas C. Dove, Chad Cline and others
Defendant:
Jim Justice , Jay Justice , Dynamic Energy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Gentry v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv07627
Plaintiff:
Judith Gentry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14896
Plaintiff:
Judy Gentry and Gary W. Gentry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv14371
Plaintiff:
Anne Gentry and James Perry Gentry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gentry v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv11219
Plaintiff:
Sally Gentry
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
