Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Holloman v. White et al
as 7:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Shavis Holloman
Defendant:
Rick White, D. Turner, Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Dallas B. Gentry
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gentry v. Unknown
as 2:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Timothy Gentry
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drayton v. Lee et al
as 1:2022cv00892
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Drayton
Defendant:
Manuel Lee, Brice Gentry and Lago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gentry et al v. Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System et al
as 1:2020cv01018
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson and Jaye Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Hospital Center Physician Group, LLC, Virginia Hospital Center Arlington Health System, Rupali K. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore, LLP v. Pride Construction, LLC
as 7:2020cv00326
Plaintiff:
Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore, LLP
Defendant:
Pride Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordon v. Brad et al
as 7:2020cv00174
Defendant:
Brad, R.OH, Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Ramon Jordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Harper et al
as 3:2018cv00510
Defendant:
Stephen R. Bloomquest, Esq., Joy C. Gentry, Lacey Simpson McKinnon and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Roderick Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sluss v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sluss
Defendant:
Raymond Gentry and Burnie Borden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gentry v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00766
Plaintiff:
Devion Gentry
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Nottoway Correctional Center, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
