Russo v. Dunn et al
| Victor Joseph Russo |
| Jefferson S Dunn, Kay Ivey, Dewayne Estes, John Doe Specks, Jane Doe Estell, John Doe Northcutt, Carol Graham, Alabama Department of Corrections, John Doe Malone and Kenneth Peters |
| 2:2017cv01005 |
| June 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Karon O Bowdre |
| John E Ott |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the 61 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/17/2020. (JLC)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER The court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and ACCEPTS his recommendation. The court ORDERS that all claims in this action, except the Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against defendants Dunn, Estes, Specks, Estell, No rthcutt, Graham, Malone, Warden (formerly Captain) Peters, all correctional officers and supervisors assigned to work P2 Dorm on April 20, 2016, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The court further ORDERS that the remaining claims are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/6/18. (SAC ) *Order placed in first class mail to pro se Plaintiff.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
