Cases 1 - 10 of 344
Pearson v. Ivey et al(INMATE 2)
as 2:2025cv00220
Plaintiff:
Undra Pearson
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nix v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2025cv00217
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neisler v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2025cv00209
Plaintiff:
Todd Stephen Neisler
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Warden Crow, Warden Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burkett v. Ivey (MAG+)
as 2:2025cv00191
Plaintiff:
Timothy T. Burkett
Defendant:
Kay Ivey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neisler v. Ivey et al
as 2:2025cv00301
Plaintiff:
Todd Stephen Neisler
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Warden Crow, Warden Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simon et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2025cv00067
Defendant:
J. Steven Roy, Mike Brock, Myla E. Calhoun and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Luna, Sydney Testman, Richard Fording and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Southern Company et al
as 2:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Mississippi Power, Kim Greene, Anthony L Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Deandrew Rolonzo Johnson II-EL v. Samuel W Junkin
as 2:2024cv01078
Defendant:
Samuel W Junkin, Dana Elmore, Thomas R. Jones, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Deandrew Rolonzo Johnson II-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grayson v. Hamm et al(DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00376
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steven T. Marshall, Terry Raybon and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Dale Grayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00724
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wayne West
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, John Emberton, Detrick McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
