Gaines v. Hines et al
Phillip J Gaines |
Monk, Hines, Cutts, Jr and Cutts, Sr |
2:2020cv01190 |
August 17, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Gray M Borden |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE - Accordingly, it is the RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. Objections to R&R due by 10/19/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 10/5/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 3 ORDER - The plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by certified copies of his jail and/or prison account statements. Doc. #2 . The application is GRANTED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). The undersigned therefore ORDERS the plaintiff to sign and return to the Clerk of Court, within 30 days of the entry date of this Order, the attached Prisoner Consent Form to signify that he wishes to continue with this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 8/19/2020. (KEK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Phillip J Gaines. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cutts, Sr, Cutts, Jr, Hines, Monk, filed by Phillip J Gaines.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.