Cases 1 - 10 of 611
CLEVELAND v. MONKELIS
as 2:2024cv01039
Defendant:
JAMES MONKELIS
Plaintiff:
NE and SCOTTY JEROME CLEVELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Monk v. U R S Midwest Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00898
Defendant:
Quincy Bridges, URS Midwest, Inc. and Romulus Insurance Risk Retention Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Monk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Flores, Buenas Aires et al
as 2:2024cv05493
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Flores, Buenas Aires, Basilica de San Jose De Flores, Militany bishoric of the Aregentian Republic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. Bowers et al
as 4:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ricardo James Jefferson, Jr.
Defendant:
Julie Bowers, M Jasso, Unknown Warford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Experian Information Solutions Inc, an Ohio corporation v. Stein Saks, PLLC et al
as 8:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
Experian Information Solutions Inc, an Ohio corporation
Defendant:
Stein Saks, PLLC, Judah Stein, Yaakov Saks and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Muhammad v. Monk et al
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Albert Monk, Gwen Wynn, Jack Cronin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kincaid et al v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03119
Plaintiff:
Colin Kincaid and Coral Monk
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. doing business as Abbott Nutrition
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Monk v. Santander Consumer USA
as 3:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Kevin Monk
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
