Wooten v. Shelby County Sheriff Department et al
Philip Lee Wooten |
Oliver, Sumers, Bedsoe, Brandi Canon, Cenesus and Shelby County Sheriff Department |
2:2020cv01694 |
October 29, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Staci G Cornelius |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER- The plaintiff's applications to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs #2 and #4 ) are GRANTED. The plaintiff is ORDERED to pay an initial filing fee of $48.15 and return the Prisoner Consent Form within thirty (30) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 11/24/20. (MRR, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Philip Lee Wooten. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(MRR, ) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is deficient for the reason(s) indicated within. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this order, in the manner explained within. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 11/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (MEB2) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Philip Lee Wooten. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bedsoe, Brandi Canon, Cenesus, Oliver, Shelby County Sheriff Department, Sumers, filed by Philip Lee Wooten.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.