Cases 1 - 10 of 22,427
Oliver et al v. Speedway
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Ashley Oliver and Robert Oliver
Defendant:
Speedway doing business as Speedway LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Mackey et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Cherryl Oliver
Defendant:
Eric Mackey and James Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oliver v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
Spencer R. Moore and Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. McDonough
as 24-1784
Claimant:
OLIVER SHANNON
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
AmGUARD Insurance Co v. Natchitoches Parish Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Defendant:
Natchitoches Parish Sheriff's Office, Natchitoches Detention Center, Sheriff Stuart Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Smith v. USA
as 2:2024cv00846
Petitioner:
William Oliver Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Oliver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05329
Plaintiff:
James Oliver
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blockson v. Oliver
as 2:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
Christopher Leonard Blockson
Respondent:
Ronald Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
