Hill v. Nash et al
| Dante Antwan Hill |
| Federal Bureau Of Prisons and Cheron Y Nash |
| 2:2021cv00518 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| R David Proctor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER #4 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED AS AMENDED; SHALL respond to the order to show cause by July 7, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 6/8/2021. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Extension of Time by Federal Bureau Of Prisons, Cheron Y Nash. (Long, Don)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE respondents appear and show cause in writing within twenty-one (21) days from the entry date of this Order, why the relief requested by Hill should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 5/17/2021. (KAM)
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number B4601113394 (KAM)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING Petitioner must either file a verified application to proceed ifp or pay the $5.00 filing fee within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G. Cornelius on 4/20/2021. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Dante Antwan Hill. (MEB2)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
