Cases 1 - 10 of 7,905
Gossett v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02138
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
William Edmond Gossett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Andrew Fields v. BOP, et al
as 24-2329
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and A. W. ECKHART
Plaintiff:
ANDREW FIELDS
Clyde Pontefract v. USA, et al
as 24-3629
Plaintiff:
CLYDE PONTEFRACT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FCI ELKTON and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Encarnacion-Lafontaine v. Warden
as 24-1971
Respondent:
EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WARDEN, WARDEN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Petitioner:
EDGAR ENCARNACION-LAFONTAINE
Owen v. Hall et al
as 4:2024cv00349
Respondent:
Patterson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mitchell and others
Petitioner:
Lauren M Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
California Coalition for Women Prisoners, et al. v. Bellhouse, et al.
as 24-4509
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, JOHN RUSSELL BELLHOUSE, THAHESHA JUSINO, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
S.I., A.S., G.M. and others
M.C.L. v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv04367
Defendant:
United States of America, United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons and Darrell Smith
Plaintiff:
M.C.L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wallace v. Shuler et al
as 1:2024fp00219
Defendant:
FNU Warner, FNU Sullivan, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Lyneal Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otufale v. FCI Memphis
as 2:2024cv02510
Petitioner:
Oluwagbemiga Otufale
Respondent:
US Department of Justice, Warden Harrison, FCI Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dennis Williams v. Charm-Tex, et al
as 24-2286
Defendant:
WARDEN STEPHEN SPAULDING, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS G. WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
