Hawkins v. Bradley et al
Karen V Hawkins |
Bryant Jamal Bradley, Postal Fleet Services Inc and Ryder |
2:2021cv01108 |
August 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 9/15/2022. Dispositive motions due by 10/17/2022. Status Conference set for Monday, 9/12/2022 at 11:00 AM, CR 7B, Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL. See Order for other deadlines and directives. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/10/2021. (YMB) |
Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Anderson, Andrew) |
Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number B4601115287. (KEK) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Bryant Jamal Bradley.(Anderson, Andrew) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ryder.(Anderson, Andrew) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Postal Fleet Services Inc.(Anderson, Andrew) |
Filing 2 HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 8/16/2021. (KEK) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Postal Fleet Services Inc, Bryant Jamal Bradley, Ryder from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, case number 01-cv-2021-901847, filed by Postal Fleet Services Inc, Bryant Jamal Bradley, Ryder. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.