Cases 1 - 10 of 1,774
Riley et al v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Tyler Riley, Manuel Calvillo, Ryder Timaj Cadena-Powell and others
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RYDER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00582
Petitioner:
PATRICIA RYDER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Enderle v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Rozetta Enderle
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Green v. Perard et al
as 8:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Arthur Green, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronje William Baptist Perard, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 Federal Tort Claims Act - Motor Vehicle
Bredow v. Le et al
as 4:2024cv10979
Plaintiff:
Mark Wade Bredow
Defendant:
Le, Lindell, Shawn and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Easterling v. Nestle USA Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Brian Easterling
Defendant:
Nestle USA Inc, Vitality Foodservice Inc, Nestle Prepared Foods Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BUERK et al v. RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
BARBARA BUERK and DANIEL BUERK
Defendant:
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Johnson v. Rival Transport LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02385
Plaintiff:
Ronald Johnson
Defendant:
Rival Transport LLC, Ryder Truck Rental Inc and Kevin Erhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
