Adams v. ADOC AL et al
| Brandon Adams |
| ADOC AL ET and Lt. Winfield |
| 2:2022cv00328 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John H England |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER that the court having received Signed prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of Brandon Adams until the full filing fee has been withheld and paid to the Clerk of the Court to satisfy the docket fee required by the filing of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 03/31/2022. (AKD)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of filing letter to the court by Brandon Adams (AKD) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM by Brandon Adams (AKD) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 MOTION or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is not required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 03/15/2022. (AKD)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Adams. (AKD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADOC AL, Lt. Winfield, filed by Brandon Adams.(AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
