Cases 1 - 10 of 100
In re: Brandon Adams
as 26-11260
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent:
CHARLES A. MAPP and AP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv04203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Adams, Brandon v. Dopp Enterprises, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00298
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Dopp Enterprises, LLC and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
In re: Brandon Adams
as 26-1664
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent:
YVETTE K. ADAMS and MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DIVISION
Adams v. Mapp et al
as 2:2026cv00080
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Charles A. Mapp and AP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Hughes et al
as 2:2025cv02184
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
Michele Hughes, Rebecca Lujan, Michael Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv13123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Adams et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv12447
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams, Toby Albritton, Heidi Alvarez and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adams et al v. THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv12088
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams, Libbie Adams, Michael Perkins and others
Defendant:
THE 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Brandon Adams
as 25-12558
Petitioner:
In re: BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
