Jefferson v. Morgan et al
| Levert Jefferson |
| Phyllis Morgan and Ty |
| 2:2023cv00305 |
| March 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The deadline has now passed, and Jefferson has not paid his initial filing fee or returned a signed Prisoner Consent Form. For the reasons stated above, the court RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to prosecute his claims. The plaintiff may file specific written objections within 14 days. Objections to R&R due by 5/11/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 4/27/2023. (MEB2) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee of $15.60, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 3/17/2023. (MEB2)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Levert Jefferson. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Phyllis Morgan, Ty, filed by Levert Jefferson.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
