Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Lynch v. Morgan et al
as 1:2025cv00567
Petitioner:
Ocie Lee Lynch
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan, John Hamm, Vencini Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boddy v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv01100
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Wendy Williams, John Q. Hamm and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Boddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Morgan (INMATE 4)
as 1:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Glenn Jones
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Morgan
as 2:2024cv00725
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Petitioner:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00708
Defendant:
John Hamm, Phyllis Morgan, Michael Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00679
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Lyons Logan and Brandon McKenzie
Plaintiff:
Lionel Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broadhead v. Gillion et al
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
T. Clark, S Moore, A. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Morgan et al
as 5:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
Jessie James Watkins
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaquille Parker v. Deandrea Pugh, et al
as 24-10861
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE PARKER
Defendant:
DEANDREA PUGH, EBONY COLEMAN, LESTER MURRAY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
