Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Morgan et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 3:2026cv00322
Plaintiff:
W. Allen Morgan and Phyllis Morgan
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
McBurnette v. Morgan
as 1:2026cv00442
Petitioner:
Martin Tracy McBurnette
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gould v. Morgan et al
as 2:2026cv00124
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan and Jefferson County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Roland Andra Gould
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2026cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams, Arnaldo Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crane v. Morgan et al
as 5:2025cv01889
Plaintiff:
David Crane
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan and Vencini Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hamm et al
as 2:2025cv01127
Plaintiff:
John Kendall Mitchell
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Greg Lovelace, Edward Ellington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lynch v. Morgan et al
as 1:2025cv00567
Petitioner:
Ocie Lee Lynch
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan, John Hamm, Vencini Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boddy v. Morgan et al
as 2:2024cv01100
Defendant:
Phyllis Morgan, Wendy Williams, John Q. Hamm and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Boddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Morgan (INMATE 4)
as 1:2024cv00382
Petitioner:
Glenn Jones
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Morgan
as 2:2024cv00725
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan
Petitioner:
Christopher Donnyiel Colbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
