Doss v. Northcutt et al
| Sandrew Doss |
| William Northcutt, Wheat, R Ragan, Tish, S Nunn, Toliver, Ragsdale and Line |
| staff attorney 1 |
| 4:2012cv02718 |
| August 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Middle Office |
| St. Clair |
| William M Acker |
| Harwell G Davis |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The magistrate judge's 87 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. Accordingly, dfts' 69 and 71 MOTIONS for Summary Judgment are DENIED. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/7/2016, at 9:00 AM, Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL; Jury Trial set for 12/5/2016, at 9:00 AM, US Courthouse, Anniston, AL before Judge Abdul K Kallon. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 8/25/2016.(YMB)
|
|
Filing
13
PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER It is ORDERED that all of plaintiffs claims in this action, except the claim of cruel and unusual punishment made against Nurse Ragsdale, are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). It is further ORDERED that the clai m against Nurse Ragsdale is REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings; Lt. Northcutt, Officer Ragan, Officer Tish, Officer Nunn, Nurse Toliver, Officer Line and Mr. Wheat terminated. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 4/22/13. (SAC )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
