Cases 1 - 10 of 531
PICKETT
as 5:2024cv00229
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER TROUTMAN, SGT ROSS, DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFERIES and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE PICKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toliver v. Jones
as 24-1857
Defendant:
G. SAJ, Deputy of Security, ELLIESS, Personnel, G. JONES, Superintendent and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL RASHEEN RAYMOND TOLIVER
Toliver v. Amsted Industries Incorporated et al
as 1:2024cv05747
Plaintiff:
April O. Toliver
Defendant:
Burgess-Norton Mfg. Co., Inc., SMW Mfg., Inc. d/b/a the Amsted Automotive Group and Amsted Industries Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BUCK et al v. SMITH et al
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
CHASTITY DAWN BUCK
Defendant:
TAMARSHE SMITH, DERRICK MCDANIEL, GLENN MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dechaun ToliverIn re: Dechaun Toliver
as 24-3521
Petitioner:
In re: DECHAUN TOLIVER
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Garcia v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, C.S.P.D. Officer and others
Murray v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03758
Defendant:
C.O. Kayla Tomasik, Dept. Hamuton, C.O. Jeffrey Monagan and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Torres et al v. Sample et al
as 3:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Hector M. Torres and Toliver
Defendant:
Sample and Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
