Boykins v. Dunn et al
| Aundra Debrel Boykins |
| Jeff Dunn, Speck, Estes, Walker and Brooks |
| 4:2019cv01109 |
| July 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John E Ott |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL This case is before the court on Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice, the court DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/9/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Aundra Debrel Boykins. (KAM) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - plaintiff must file a new verified application to proceed ifp accompanied by a certified copy of jail and/or prison account statments for the last six months; within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 8/5/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 4 Complaint w/signatures in RESPONSE to re #3 filed by Aundra Debrel Boykins. (KAM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING plaintiff must sign his complaint form within 14 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 7/24/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aundra Debrel Boykins. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brooks, Jeff Dunn, Estes, Speck, Walker, filed by Aundra Debrel Boykins.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
