Cases 1 - 10 of 49,426
Walker v. Galloway
as 3:2024cv01171
Plaintiff:
Terrill A Walker
Defendant:
Darren Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv11110
Plaintiff:
Nola Walker
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Walker #230537 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
James Edward Walker #230537
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tello v. Lea County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Karina Tello
Defendant:
Lea County Board of Commissioners, Corey Helton, Michael Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Walker v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Amanda Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walker v. Carbor et al
as 2:2024cv11093
Plaintiff:
Anthony Daniel Walker
Defendant:
Kim Carbor, Marienfield, Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Nanos, et al.
as 24-2601
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY LEE WARREN
Defendant:
CHRIS NANOS, Sheriff, LAURA CONOVER, County Attorney, SAMANTHA WALKER, CES Dut and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kenneth Walker v. National Property Board, et al
as 24-7061
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Walker
Defendant:
National Property Board, Andreas Ten Berge, Urlika Frank and others
Walker v. CFMOTO Powersports, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Lewis Walker
Defendant:
CFMOTO Powersports, Inc. and Ficititious Defendants 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
