Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Walker v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv09585
Plaintiff: Jade Walker
Defendant: L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC and others
: Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08836
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05533
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. Payne
as 4:2026cv00808
Plaintiff: Tarus Walker
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALKER v. THE MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
as 1:2026cv09481
Plaintiff: CLARENCE WALKER
Defendant: THE MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Taylor #230897 v. Naphcare LLC et al
as 2:2026cv05509
Plaintiff: Charles Scott Taylor
Defendant: Naphcare LLC, Sicily Walker, James Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyko v. City of Cleveland et al.
as 1:2026cv01859
Plaintiff: Timothy A. Boyko
Defendant: City of Cleveland, Dorothy A. Todd, Dorant A. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06769
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
United States v. Chase Walker
as 26-2582
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Chase Smith Walker
WALKER v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2026cv08805
Plaintiff: CORD WALKER
Defendant: General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?