Cases 1 - 10 of 488
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Kurt Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Alinda Walker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Walker, Jr. v. Nolan et al
as 1:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Donald Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Attorney Tim Nolan, Attorney Leon Hewitt, Austin Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Walker v. Coleman Professionals Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Sarah Walker
Defendant:
Coleman Professionals Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Walker v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Roger Walker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Natasha Walker and Nathan Walker
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
