Smith v. Toney et al
| Danny L Smith |
| Toney and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The |
| 4:2021cv00899 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| R David Proctor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned RECOMMENDS the court DISMISS the petition for writ of habeas corpus WITHOUT PREJUDICE to allow Smith an opportunity to petition the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals for authorization to file a successive petition in the appropriate court. Objections to R&R due by 8/25/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 8/11/2021. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 5
RESPONSE to re #4 filed by Danny L Smith. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Petitioner shall show cause within 21 days, why his petition should bnot be dismissed as successive; Show Cause Response due by 8/2/2021.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 7/12/2021. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 7/7/2021. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Danny L Smith. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Danny L Smith.(KAM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
