Cases 1 - 10 of 1,547
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Schulz et al v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
William Schulz and Toney A. White III
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean and NDOC Med Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miriam Tidwell v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
as 24-11228
Plaintiff:
MIRIAM TIDWELL, Administrator of the Estate of James O'Quinn, Deceased
Defendant:
JEFFERSON DUNN, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Corrections in his offical and individual capacities, DEBORA TONEY, In her official and individual capacities, WARDEN, STATON CF and others
Adams v. Bailey et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Adams
Defendant:
Bryan Bailey, Christan Dedman, Unknown K-9 Officer and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Joshua W Harmon
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, C O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Rounsavall et al
as 5:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kinsey Anne Rounsavall, Toney Rounsavall and Jeanne Rounsavall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stockman v. Edwards
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Randy Malcolm Stockman
Defendant:
Toney Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
