Watkins v. Morgan County Commissioner et al
||Jimmy Lee Watkins
||Morgan County Commissioner, Jefferson Dunn, Anna Franklin, Sgt Corriko, Ozbolt, Allen, McVay, Driggers and Brady
||April 27, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||Staci G Cornelius
||Abdul K Kallon
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 12, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 22 Report and Recommendation; Having reviewed and considered all the materials in this case the Magistrate Judge's Report is ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED, The court ORDERS that t he following claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted: (1) the plaintiff's claims against the Morgan County Commission and its members; (2) the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment fail ure to protect claim against Sheriff Ana Franklin; and (3) the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment medical claims against defendants Ozbolt, Corriko, McVay, Allen, Driggers, and unknown officers for their failure to provide grievance forms to the pl aintiff; the following claims are REFERRED to the magistrate judge for further proceedings: (1) the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure to protect claims against defendant Ozbolt and unknown officers; (2) the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for denial of medical treatment against defendants Ozbolt, Corriko, McVay, Allen, Driggers, and unknown officers; and (3) the plaintiffs retaliation claim against defendant Ozbolt. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 10/11/2017. (KBB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?