Cases 1 - 10 of 4,694
Krishonn Cooney v. Brady Knuckles
as 24-1898
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Brady Knuckles, State Trooper, Arkansas State Police
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Benjamin Watson, Jr., et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 24-11310
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN WATSON, JR., SHEILA WILEMON WATSON, SHANE WALTERS and others
Defendant:
KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA
Star Colbert v. Dougan
as 24-1073
Plaintiff:
STAR COLBERT, ASSENAGON CREDIT SUBDEBT AND COCO, AXIOM EUROPEAN FINANCIAL DEBT FUND LIMITED, Individually and on Behalf of Other Credit Suisse Group AG AT1 Bondholders and others
Defendant:
BRADY W. DOUGAN, ERIC VARVEL, JAMES L. AMINE and others
Brady v. Mosca, et al
as 24-1378
Plaintiff:
LISA MARIE BRADY
Defendant:
JENI MOSCA, PAMELA MACDONALD, JEANNE KINCAID and others
Jordan v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 3:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Kyle Andrew Jordan
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, United States Department of Homeland Security, Brady James Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 U.S. Defendant
Borne v. Home Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jason Borne
Defendant:
Home Bank, N.A., Stephen Damore, Newman, Mathis, Brady & Spedale, PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Carr, Jazemine Adams, Brandon D Alexander-Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Cooney v. Knuckles
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Tyrone Cooney
Defendant:
Brady Knuckles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
