Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00210
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Burkett v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04318
Plaintiff:
Brady Burkett
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
BRADY v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv01921
Plaintiff:
BETH BRADY
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv11661
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dean v. Cain et al
as 3:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
Clifton Dean
Defendant:
Burl Cain, John Hunt, Mike Dixon and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brady v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01945
Plaintiff:
Albert D Brady
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Turner v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 26-5838
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH TURNER
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, Use of a form to discriminate, COUNTY OF WASCO, CAP, Personally, Director KENNY ARCINLEGA and others
Beverly Harris v. Department of the Army, et al
as 26-5315
Plaintiff:
Beverly M. Harris
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Office Special Investigations and others
Ruiz v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 7:2026cv07510
Plaintiff:
Juan Ruiz
Defendant:
The City of Yonkers, Yonkers Police Department, Captain Rooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
