Duncan v. Alabama Department of Corrections, The et al
| Michael Shawn Duncan |
| Kay Ivey, Alabama Department of Corrections, The, Deborah Toney, Scarlett Robinson, William Streeter and Jefferson S. Dunn |
| 5:2020cv01204 |
| August 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of MICHAEL SHAWN DUNCAN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 9/21/2020. (PSM)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of fling: PRISONER CONSENT FORM by Michael Shawn Duncan (MEB2)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is not required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 8/21/2020. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Shawn Duncan. (MEB2)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Alabama Department of Corrections, The, Jefferson S. Dunn, Kay Ivey, Scarlett Robinson, William Streeter, Deborah Toney, filed by Michael Shawn Duncan.(MEB2)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
