Jones v. King et al
Plaintiff: Frederick D Jones
Defendant: T Driggers, D King, Hubbard and Gibbs
Case Number: 5:2021cv00112
Filed: January 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Staci G Cornelius
Referring Judge: Madeline Hughes Haikala
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that the court having received prisoner consent form the Warden is directed to deduct Monthly Payments from Prison Account of Frederick D Jones. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 3/16/2021. (KEK)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of filing: Additional Statement/Facts and Demand for Jury Trial by Frederick D Jones. (KEK)
March 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RESPONSE to #3 Order re Filing Fee filed by Frederick D Jones. (KEK)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing fee: $ 10, receipt number B4601111742. (KEK)
February 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM filed by Frederick D Jones. (KEK)
January 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - The plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by certified copies of his jail and/or prison account statements. (Doc. #2 ). The application is GRANTED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). The plaintiff is ORDERED to pay an initial partial filing fee of $8.26 in order to commence this action, and thereafter to make monthly installment payments toward payment of the full filing fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 1/28/2021. (KEK)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frederick D Jones. (KEK)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against T Driggers, Gibbs, Hubbard, D King, filed by Frederick D Jones.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. King et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick D Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T Driggers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hubbard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gibbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?