Cases 1 - 10 of 100
GIBBS v. ROLLINS et al
as 1:2026cv02584
Plaintiff:
TYQUAN D. GIBBS
Defendant:
BROOKE ROLLINS, N.J. TRANSIT CORP., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibbs v. Siranides et al
as 1:2026cv00896
Plaintiff:
Hertford Gibbs
Defendant:
Officer Jake Siranides, Officer Tyler Clendaniel, Officer Jeremiah Purnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Rockstrem et al
as 2:2026cv00304
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Christopher Boyd
Defendant:
Alex Rockstrem, Jennifer Gonzolez, WCC Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tirrell Middleton v. Brooklyn Townsend, et al
as 26-2380
Plaintiff:
Tirrell Audrelius Middleton
Defendant:
Brooklyn Townsend, LPN, Brianna Roberts, R.N., Milinda Sorbello, R.N. FNPBC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Remington v. Gibb et al
as 1:2026cv06950
Plaintiff:
Bruce Remington
Defendant:
Dr. Gibb and Amelia Burroughs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
GIBBS v. BAILEY et al
as 3:2026cv08387
Plaintiff:
TYQUAN D. GIBBS
Defendant:
HUGH BAILEY and CRAIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GIBBS v. SAUREZ
as 3:2026cv08385
Plaintiff:
TYQUAN D. GIBBS
Defendant:
JACKIE SAUREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Velez et al v. Town of Wallingford et al
as 3:2026cv01046
Plaintiff:
Karla L. Velez and James L. Contreras
Defendant:
Town of Wallingford and Parris Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Consumers' Research v. FCC
as 26-60511
Petitioner:
Consumers' Research, Cause Based Commerce, Incorporated, Edward J. Blum and others
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
