Douglas v. Limestone Correctional Facility et al
| Joshua Lamont Douglas |
| Limestone Correctional Facility, Amber Johnson and Roderick Gadsen |
| 5:2023cv01219 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Liles C Burke |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay an initial partial filing fee of $13.33, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 10/26/2023. (AHI)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Lamont Douglas. (AHI) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff must correct the deficiency within 14 days; failure to comply with this order may result in this action being dismissed for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 9/25/2023. (AHI)
|
| Filing 3 PRISONER Case Number Notice (AHI) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Lamont Douglas. (SPT ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Roderick Gadsen, Amber Johnson, and Limestone Correctional Facility filed by Joshua Lamont Douglas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(SPT ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
