Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Johnson v. Prudential Insurance Co of America
as 1:2024cv21299
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Co of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Johnson v. Butler et al
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Kelly Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amber Johnson v. Adele Grubbs et al
as 2:2024cv00134
Defendant:
Donye Smith, Judge Adele Grubbs, Judge Kimberly A. Childs and others
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas v. Limestone Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lamont Douglas
Defendant:
Limestone Correctional Facility, Amber Johnson and Roderick Gadsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adler et al v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2023cv06513
Plaintiff:
Sabine Adler, Annalisa Barron, Hannah Bauman and others
Defendant:
The City Of Rochester, Michael Koerner, Gerald Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amber Johnson v. Donye Dimitri et al
as 2:2023cv06565
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Donye Dimitri and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amber Johnson v. LaMelo Ball
as 23-55520
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMBER JOHNSON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
LAMELO BALL, an individual
Johnson v. Coon et al
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Eric Coon, ESA P Portfolio LLC, ESA Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson v. F-Star Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06103
Plaintiff:
Amber J Johnson and Amber Johnson
Defendant:
F-Star Therapeutics, Inc., Pamela Klein, Geoffrey Race and others
Johnson v. Braum's, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Braum's, Inc. and Braum's Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
