Beasley v. Smith et al
Jerry Michael Beasley |
Nick Smith, Shoemaker, Holtzman and Calloway |
6:2023cv01243 |
September 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
John H England |
R David Proctor |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jerry Michael Beasley (KAM) |
Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the court DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on Beasleys failure to prosecute his claims. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 10/30/2023. (KAM) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jerry Michael Beasley (KAM) |
Filing 4 ORDER - The application is deficient for the following reasons as set out. The plaintiff must correct this deficiency within 30 days. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the form application to proceed in forma pauperis on the plaintiff along with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 9/21/2023. (KSS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE re: case number as to Jerry Michael Beasley. (KSS) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Application) for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jerry Michael Beasley. (KSS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calloway, Holtzman, Shoemaker, Nick Smith, filed by Jerry Michael Beasley.(KSS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.