Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bethea v. McKormick Law Firm et al
as 3:2026cv03136
Petitioner:
Damion Bethea
Respondent:
McKormick Law Firm, Brad Shoemaker, Martin L. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hoover v. Havens et al
as 3:2026cv03109
Petitioner:
Linton Hoover
Respondent:
Tyson Havens, Det Rachael, McCormick Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Candelaria v. Shoemaker et al
as 3:2026cv03082
Petitioner:
Cristian Candelaria
Respondent:
Brad Shoemaker and McKormick Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
NARANJO v. DOC EMPLOYEES et al
as 1:2026cv02932
Plaintiff:
Isaac Naranjo
Defendant:
Doc Employees, Stacey A. Plassio, Melissa L. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shoemaker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01149
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Matthew Shoemaker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Khanisa Darby v. 120 Northampton LLC, et al
as 26-3289
Plaintiff:
KHANISA DARBY
Defendant:
120 NORTHAMPTON LLC, POST ROAD MANAGEMENT LLC, BORKO MILOSEV and others
Redd-Sykes v. Fidorchyk et al
as 1:2026cv02606
Plaintiff:
Tyvon M. Redd-Sykes
Defendant:
Fidorchyk, Fritz, Medavitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
