Sanford v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
| Bobby L Sanford, Jr |
| Bailey, Lt Jackson, Tuscaloosa County Jail and Ted Sexton |
| staff attorney |
| 7:2011cv03544 |
| October 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Western Office |
| Tuscaloosa |
| Robert R Armstrong |
| R David Proctor |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION -re: 35 Report and Recommendation. The court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Reprot is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 2/3/2014. (AVC)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER. Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the Report and Recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the Magis trate Judge's Recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that all of Plaintiff's claims in this action except his Fourteenth Amendment medical care claims against Dr. Phillip Bobo are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment medical care claims against Dr. Phillip Bobo are REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 7/5/2012. ** copy provided to pro se pltf by US Mail, this date. (FNC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
