Pasture v. Tuscaloosa County Jail et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 19, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court ADOPTS the legal standard for summary judgment as set out by the magistrate judge in his report. Applying that legal standard and taking the facts in the light most favorable to Mr. Pasture, the court disagrees with the magistrate judge's conclusion that no genuine issues of material fact exist in this case. Because the court finds that genuine issues of material fact exist regarding whether Officer O'Bryant purposefully and knowingly injured Mr. Pasture with a razor blade, the court DENIES Officer O'Bryant's motion for summary judgment. The court will set this case for pre-trial and trial by a separate order. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 9/19/17. (SAC )
|March 28, 2016
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation and the plaintiff's objections, the court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and AC CEPTS his recommendations. The court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all of the plaintiff's claims in this action except the excessive force claim against Officer O'Bryant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The court ORDERS that the excessive force claim against Officer O'Bryant be REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge Karon O Bowdre on 3/28/16. (SAC ) *Order placed in first class mail to pro se Plaintiff.
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?