Wallace v. Tuscaloosa Police Department et al
Judvis Wallace |
State of Alabama, Tuscaloosa County Jail and Tuscaloosa Police Department |
7:2018cv01685 |
October 15, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Herman N Johnson |
Abdul K Kallon |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING: the court ORDERS the plaintiff to correct his application to proceed in forma pauperis and to file an amended complaint within 15 days from the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/28/2018. (AFS) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of State Court filings by Judvis Wallace (AFS) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - The plaintiffs complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis are deficient for the reasons indicated below. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this order, in the manner explained. The plaintiff has failed to identify a defendant who is subject to being sued. The plaintiff must name defendants who are subject to suit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 10/17/2018. (KEK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Judvis Wallace. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Alabama, Tuscaloosa County Jail, Tuscaloosa Police Department, filed by Judvis Wallace.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.