Holloway v. Aerotek Inc
| Abby Holloway |
| Aerotek Inc, Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc. and Ayman Shaout |
| 7:2022cv00296 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Abby Holloway. Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc. served on 4/18/2022, answer due 5/9/2022. (Williams, Sara) |
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Megan A. Scheiderer on behalf of Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc.Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 04/28/2022. (SUH)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Limited Admission [Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Megan A. Scheiderer) by Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing)(Alston, Michael) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint by Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc..(Alston, Michael) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number AALNDC-4074833 (ALND B4601119876). (Alston, Michael) Modified on 4/28/2022 (KEK). |
| Filing 11 Request for service by certified mail filed by Abby Holloway. (Williams, Sara) |
| Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc., Ayman Shaout, filed by Abby Holloway.(Williams, Sara) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden filed by Abby Holloway, Aerotek Inc. Telephone conference set for 4/13/2022 is CANCELLED. (KAM) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE to remind parties of consent conference scheduled at 10:00 AM on Wednesday, April 13, 2022; if all parties submit an executed consent form, either consenting or declining magistrate judge jurisdiction, the conference will be cancelled (ASL) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. The parties Rule 26 deadlines are EXTENDED by 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 3/30/2022. (JGB)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Conduct FRCP Rule 26 Conference and Initial Disclosures by Aerotek Inc. (Alston, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER that the parties are reminded that this case will be reassigned to a district judge after 4/28/2022 unless they unanimously consent to the dispositive jurisdiction of a magistrate judge; Telephone Conference set for 4/13/2022 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden; parties are to call as directed; if all parties submit an executed consent before 4/13/2022, the telephone conference will be cancelled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 3/16/2022. (KAM) Modified on 3/23/2022 (KAM).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on March 16, 2022. (ASL)
|
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by Aerotek Inc.(Alston, Michael) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Aerotek Inc. filed by Aerotek Inc (Alston, Michael) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4031828. related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Aerotek Inc from Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court, case number 63-2022-900076., filed by Aerotek Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(KAM). (Alston, Michael) NDAL rec# B4601118966 Modified on 3/8/2022 (KAM). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Aerotek Inc from Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court, case number 63-2022-900076., filed by Aerotek Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
