Howard v. Powell
| Gavin Howard |
| Jordan Powell, Jeremy Herd, Keith Cox, David Lance Bailey and David Pate |
| 7:2022cv00727 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Gray M Borden |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to add parties to pending case by Gavin Howard. (AHI) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of filing by Gavin Howard. (KEK) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE regarding filing fee, signed complaint, and prison mail tampering by Gavin Howard (AHI) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Waive Initial Filing Fee and Submission of Additional Evidence by Gavin Howard. (KEK) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of filing information and signed last page of complaint by Gavin Howard. (KEK) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of filing by Gavin Howard. (KEK) |
Filing 4
ORDER - The plaintiff has not signed his complaint form. The plaintiff must sign the enclosed copy of the complaint and return it to the Clerk of Court. The plaintiff must correct this deficiency within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 7/7/2022. (KEK)
|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re: case number. (KEK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gavin Howard. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jordan Powell, filed by Gavin Howard.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
