Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Powell
as 7:2024cv00510
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
James Young, Drew Wade, Andrew C Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gavin Howard v. James Young, et al
as 23-13643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAVIN HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK COLLARD, PICKENS COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK, PICKENS COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01346
Petitioner:
Gavin Howard
Respondent:
Jordan Powell and Steven Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Powell et al
as 7:2023cv01275
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Jordan Powell and Keith Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Young et al
as 7:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
James Mickey Young, Keith Cox, Jordan Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Pickens County Alabama
as 7:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Pickens County Alabama, Keith Booty Cox, Jeremy Herd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Pickens County, Alabama et al
as 7:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Pickens County, Alabama, Craig Patterson, David L Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Pickens County Alabama et al
as 7:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
Gavin Howard
Defendant:
Pickens County Alabama, Jordan Powell, Keith Booty Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
