Pardue, et al v. Mobile County, AL, et al
| 1:1999cv00799 |
| September 1, 1999 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Callie V.S. Granade |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
411
JUDGMENT, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that JUDGMENT be and is hereby entered in favor defendants, Mike Davis, Tom Harrison, Willis Holloway, and Marion Sennett, and against plaintiff, Michael R. Pardue. Therefore, all plaintiff's claims against the defendants are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Costs are to be taxed against the plaintiff. Signed by Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 1/14/2011. (copy to pltf) (mab)
|
|
Filing
333
ORDER GRANTING 332 Motion to Stay & STAYING this action pending the U.S. Supreme Court's decision. Dfts are to advise the court upon the filing of the petition for certioari & are to advise the court w/i 10 days of a ruling on the petition. The clerk is directed to place this case on the court's administrative docket. Signed by Chief Judge Callie V. S. Granade on 10/7/08. (tot)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pardue, et al v. Mobile County, AL, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
