Johnson v. Wood et al
||June 30, 2005
||US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
||Civil Rights: Other Office
||Sonja F. Bivins
||Kristi K. DuBose
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 1, 2010
Order re: MKH's motion for contempt (doc. 283). MKH's request for the Court to find Reginald Johnson in civil contempt and the request to have this matter referred to the U.S. Attorney for prosecution of criminal contempt charges against R eginald Johnson of the 2007 Injunction is DENIED. The Court finds that Viola Shaw and Jamiale Johnson have violated the 2007 Injunction. Respondent Jamiale Johnson is ordered to sign by 10/8/2010 the necessary documents to withdraw the 2009 Affidavi t of Forgery as set out. Viola Shaw and Jamiale Johnson are jointly liable for MKH's reasonable attorney fees incurred for the show cause hearing. MKH to submit documentation in support of attorney fees by 10/14/2010. ( Miscellaneous deadline set for 10/14/2010.) Copies mailed to Reginald Johnson, Viola Shaw, Jamiale Johson and Shirley Johnson-Young.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/1/2010. (cmj)
|January 28, 2009
Order enteed that this action is dismissed subject to the right of any party to reinstate the action within 20 days of the date of this order should settlement agreement, as represented to the court, not be consummated.. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/22/09. (cmj)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?