Jones v. Culliver
| 1:2005cv00712 |
| February 7, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
AMENDED ORDER (doc. 33) ADOPTING Report and Recommendation modifying that portion of the Recommendation on pages six-nine is Stricken and replaced as sets out, and Motions for COA and IFP are denied. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 3/20/09. (copy to Appellant, e-mailed to USCA). (jal)
|
|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT entered that this petition is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/14/09. (copy to petitioner) (cmj)
|
|
Filing
22
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus & 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Anthony Jones stating the petitions should be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 11/25/08. Copies to parties.(mpp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Culliver | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
