Shaw v. Barnhart
| 1:2006cv00621 |
| October 16, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Sonja F. Bivins |
| Charles R. Butler |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 23 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Ernest Shaw. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A", # 2 Exhibit "B", # 3 Exhibit "C") (Lassiter, Byron) filed by Ernest Shaw, 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Ernest Shaw. The petitioner is authorized to receive $2,684.85 as a fee for services rendered before this court, and the petitioner is directed to disburse to plaintiff the sum of $830.85 which was previously awarded pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act. Signed by Senior Judge Charles R. Butler, Jr on 3/17/09. (adk)
|
|
Filing
26
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Ernest Shaw. Objections to R&R due by 3/4/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sonja F. Bivins on 2/18/09. (adk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shaw v. Barnhart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
