Freemanville Water System, Inc. v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians et al

Plaintiff: Freemanville Water System, Inc.
Defendant: Poarch Band of Creek Indians and P.C.I. Gaming and Creek Indian Enterprises
Case Number: 1:2007cv00688
Filed: September 27, 2007
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Mobile Office
County: Escambia
Referring Judge: Bert W. Milling
Presiding Judge: William H. Steele
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 31:3731 Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freemanville Water System, Inc. v. Poarch Band of Creek Indians et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Freemanville Water System, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Marriott Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Poarch Band of Creek Indians
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: P.C.I. Gaming and Creek Indian Enterprises
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?