Taylor et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC et al
Doug Taylor and Tonya Taylor |
WAL-MART STORES, INC and Strong Built, Incorporated |
1:2008cv00188 |
April 10, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
P.I.: Other Office |
Mobile |
William E. Cassady |
Kristi K. DuBose |
Both |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 ORDER granting 47 Motion to Stay deadlines set forth in the Rule 16(b) scheduling order. All deadlines set forth in the Rule 16(b) scheduling order (Doc. 18), as amended (Doc. 42), which REMAIN PENDING ARE STAYED. In other words, because the dead line for filing amendments to pleadings and joining parties (Doc. 18, at 4) has long since passed, that deadline is NOT stayed. However, all other deadlines (see Docs. 18 & 42) are STAYED pending resolution of the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 3/27/09. (cmj) |
Filing 45 ORDER denying 44 Motion to Stay as set out. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 3/20/09. (cmj) |
Filing 39 ORDER denying 37 Motion to Amend Magistrate Judge Order; denying 37 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order; denying 38 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Cassady on 2/6/09. (cmj) |
Filing 33 Order re: 32 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by WAL-MART STORES, INC, ( Responses due by 2/9/2009). Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 1/28/09. (cmj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.