Sylva-Kalonji v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County
Plaintiff: Rochelle Sylva-Kalonji
Defendant: Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County
Case Number: 1:2008cv00207
Filed: April 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Mobile
Presiding Judge: William E. Cassady
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting defendant's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment as set out. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 5/19/09. (cmj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sylva-Kalonji v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rochelle Sylva-Kalonji
Represented By: Gregory B. Stein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?