Bealle v. HomEq Servicing Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Thomas B. Bealle, III
Defendant: HomEq Servicing Corp. and ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00210
Filed: April 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama
Office: Insurance Office
County: Mobile
Presiding Judge: William H. Steele
Presiding Judge: Bert W. Milling
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bealle v. HomEq Servicing Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas B. Bealle, III
Represented By: T. Dwight Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HomEq Servicing Corp.
Represented By: Daniel Lewis Feinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc.
Represented By: George W. Walker, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?