Maudlin v. Johnny Kynard Logging, Inc.

Plaintiff: Willie J. Maudlin, Jr.
Defendant: Johnny Kynard Logging, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2008cv00307
Filed: June 5, 2008
Court: Alabama Southern District Court
Office: Labor: Fair Standards Office
County: Mobile
0 Judge:
Referring Judge: William E. Cassady
Presiding Judge: Kristi K. DuBose
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 20, 2009 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 31 Motion to Certify Class. Plaintiff's motion for judicial assistance to facilitate class notice is granted. The parties are ordered to confer regarding the notice as set out herein. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/20/09. (cmj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maudlin v. Johnny Kynard Logging, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie J. Maudlin, Jr.
Represented By: David A. Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnny Kynard Logging, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?